Yes. But Mono stinks. It is essentially a VB/C# compatible for GTk+. The 
actual .NET libraries just don't work.
Simon

Andy Leon wrote:
> I think they've dropped J# largely because they're going after Java  
> with the .NET framework as a whole. Due to the Mono project  
> allowing .NET to run on Linux and Mac, Microsoft suddenly found  
> themselves as the patent-holder for a cross-platform framework. So now  
> C# and VB.NET can go up against Java directly, Microsoft can put J++/ 
> J# to bed and not get sniped at by the odd lawsuit from Sun.
>
> Andy
>
> On 5 Jun 2009, at 13:35, Simon O'Riordan wrote:
>
>   
>> And now for something completely different.
>> I had an academic edition of VS2005. I have just upgraded it to 2008
>> standard. So now I have a full commercial license.
>> I quite like the MFC string-handling, but mostly because I have a  
>> strong
>> suspicion that they broke the String.h functions so that they only
>> append rather than recreate. Maybe that's how it's supposed to be.
>> Anyway, they've finally dropped their Java clone. That's one up for  
>> the
>> competition.
>> SimonO
>>
>> -- 
>> Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
>> Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
>> Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
>> List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset
>>     
>
>
>   
-- 
Next meeting: Bournemouth, 2009-06-03 20:00
Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.org&channel=%23dorset
List info: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dorset

Reply via email to