Alan Hourihane wrote:
Or 4.2.x for most recent x? What about bugs that are found in the modules after XFree is released? Or api changes within the kernel?On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:02:30PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:For 'stable DRM' you need to stick with XFree86 4.2.0 and the DRM modulesOn Wed, 2002-12-11 at 22:11, D. Hageman wrote:Alan,
What would you like to see be implemented to help get the job done. In other words, what do you need from the DRI team?
It takes two to tango so its not just what I need its also what do they need. What I would like to see would be: A single definitive source for the DRM code, one where contributions go back from Linux, from *BSD, from core XFree86 as well as from the DRI project. The ability to track changes to that with reasons so that we can keep a stable DRM and also the 'DRM of the day' visible to the kernel people - perhaps the devel kernel tree having an option for "Development DRM (XFree86 4.4) (Y/M/N)".
that ship with 4.2.0. For 'DRM of the day' use the DRI trunk.
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
