On Wednesday 17 March 2004 14:06, ajax wrote: > No problem. I split the branches into current, sleeping, merged, and > obsolete, and added a note about the DRM changes. I'll be adding more to > that list shortly.
Added a few to the list, mostly things I've had trouble with while getting tdfx to work again. > In the future, if a change to the trunk requires changes in a current or > sleeping branch, it should get a link on that list. Of course ideally we'd > have no sleeping branches... Which reminds me. Brian, you'd said in: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-devel&m=107099482602285&w=2 that DRI builds should happen against a tagged Mesa branch. Currently the Building page tells people to build against HEAD. I know that's not good, but is that branch still the officially-blessed branch for stable builds? - ajax ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
