Emily Ravenwood wrote: > So, yes, use it now, even to codifying it for ease of insertion for > as long as we need it and because some people will want to continue > using it. But, yes, please, please, please, also put it on the list > that we need something that will create a *genuine* relationship > between "foo" and "bar".
This. Also, everything else Emily says, which I've been trying to write up into a coherant e-mail. What annoys my most about the current clunky work around is the proliferation of tags. Because they aren't properly hieriarchical, as well as having the 'end' tag, I have to create another tag at each level, and add *that* to the post, because otherwise I can't actually use the hierarchy for pulling up groups of posts. So if I had a tag 'writing:wips:administration' I'd also need to create the tags 'writing' and 'writing:wips' and put them on all the posts along with the first tag. It's ugly, and proliferates tags like a rash all over the posts. It's the main reason I've only ever bothered to use hierarchical tags on a community, even though I'd love to have them on my personal journals as well. > --ER love Anna _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
