Which is why I think making it optional and opt-in (clickable) on individual posts is the way to go.
(Not that I'm saying it's easy or doable, mind you, but preferable.) On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Lije Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Except the IP tracking system doesn't match to username, it just provides > the IP address. A third-party system such as LJToys is required to obtain a > username for you. > > I'm pretty sure people might find this a bit of a privacy violation; it > would likely require active consent from the reader at the time they read an > entry, much like Outlook will ask you if you want to send a read receipt > back to someone who's requested one for an email. > > > Thanks, > principia_coh > Alexis Carpenter > > ----- Silicon Shaman wrote: > > | > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Tree Wishes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> | I've noticed that just about every site these days is emulating Digg, >> >> >> | meaning they have a thumbs up/thumbs down kind of rating system for >> >> >> | posts. >> >> >> | >> >> >> | [snip] >> >> >> | >> >> >> | In either case, I would love to have a button to click that says "yay, >> >> >> | I read this and it was great" without actually, you know, commenting. >> >> >> | > > I don't think we'd a thumbs up, thumbs down system as such...but how about > an option > > | that logs iP and matches it to user-name, so you could tell if User > > | so&so read your post? [basically, more or less the same as IP logging on > LJ] > > > | > > > | I often see people querying if anyone reads their journal, because > > | hardly anyone has commented in a awhile. That way, at least you'd know > > | they'd looked at it. > > -- > Silicon.shaman > Cogito ergo periculosus. > [ I think, therefore I'm dangerous ]. > > > > _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
