>> majorbrokerage.com does not give a flying fuck about putting a banner
>> ad on golddirectory.com (sorry Bob! :) )
>
>It's Craig.
>
Sorry! I'd just been writing Bob, Bob, Bob, Bob, Bob, Bob, Bob, Bob
in promoting Bobgold .. I mean Bananagold ...
>Otherwise, what good is the e-gold webpage, as an advertising venue, if only
>a few major businesses can afford to put ads there? So what if those
>businesses simply stay out? The growth of e-gold should not depend on such
>businesses. It should depend on its popularity with small businesses and the
>average person -- AS LONG as it continues to grow. Don't get me wrong... I
>WOULD like to see a major big company involved, but do you want to marry the
>e-gold webpage to them to do so?
Well I think that's just economics, C., -- whether a one big company,
or many little companies, or one media outlet, or whatever, takes it
over, "god sorts it out"
> Perhaps E-gold should be impartial to
>business. Perhaps it should be like the blind-folded woman ..
Kinky imagery ... but yes, capitalism is blind. You say "the ads on
the page are $9 per thousand".
As a owner of a small, shit, business like Bobgold, I'd love to buy
just a few hundred dollars worth.
Others may buy more, or less. Good for them ....
> with the scale in
>her hands, minding the store, but not playing favorites -- AS LONG as it
>continues to grow.
>
>Craig (Not Bob)
>
>
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
"I feel like we're inside a Civilization game and there's some
fucking idiot playing." --Michael T. McNamara
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
