Hi Debbie,
Yes, we're sending 997s for 824s that we receive. I don't see it as
redundant since the 824 is in actuality a new document, even though it
reflects the status of a previous transaction.
Harold DeWayne, CECP, CECCA
Gates-McDonald Health Plus
Columbus, OH
(614) 527.4081
Sorry for the short reply, but I'm deep in the "innards" of a map right
now.
HD
From: Debbie Shaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@LISTSERV.UCOP.EDU> on
07/10/2000 12:34 PM
Please respond to Debbie Shaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Electronic Data Interchange Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: A 997 response for an 824 Application Advice
Hi all,
We are planning to use an 824 Application Advice transaction to indicate to
our trading partners that an 810 invoice they sent us had problems. Should
we request they return us a 997 to indicate they received the 824?? In my
mind, I'm thinking the 824 is saying we aren't obligated to pay the invoice
until the errors are corrected....if we don't verify they received this
transaction, we could potentially be dinged for a late payment.
Are any of you doing the same thing?? Is the 997 really kind of
redundant???
Thanks in advance!!!
Debbie Shaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
206.318.8739
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
