Yes, I have only heard of charges for NOT using EDI.

Why don't you bluff and float the idea of using paper? See if they suddenly
discover the "benefit of EDI".

Anthony Beecher

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Divoky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 We have all heard of extra charges for sending paper documents but not
vice versa, I suspect.  If the use of EDI and any possible EDI charges were
not specified in the original contract,
someone slipped up.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Pokraka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Now that the deal is struck, supplier comes back and
> says that EDI is of no benefit to them, but merely a service that they
> provide as part of the package, thus they will charge their customer for
it.

=======================================================================
To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/

Reply via email to