hi, Am Montag, den 27.03.2006, 13:56 +0200 schrieb Edward Holcroft: > This is an artificial distinction. Are developers not users? Can a > user not be a developer? How would you expect the content of mails to > differ between these lists? sure he/she can, but edubuntu is the only ubuntu distro that only has this one list, all other follow the namig scheme of having -users, -devel and the localized lists
> What would be the purpose of such a split? It's not like this is a > busy list. Usually one considers this when a list becomes too busy to > follow, although it would have to be really busy to be too much for > even a moderately experienced list user. the idea behind the split as i understood it in the pre-last edubuntu meeting was to give users that are scared by the -devel name an opportunity to communicate, i agree that the list is *very* low traffic and not restricted to -devel problems at all, but the name doesnt indicate that. > > So I guess vote "no" to a split as currently mooted. > > If there just has to be split for some reason, then I would suggest a > "technical" list, and a "chat" list. A discussion about whether the > list should be split for example, would fall under "chat". thats exactly how lists are split in the ubuntu world, a chat list "-users" and a tech list "-devel" for every ubuntu based distro out there :) ciao oli
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- edubuntu-devel mailing list edubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-devel