Don,

I still use a fairly wide filter (1 KHz to 1.5 KHz) on my K3 when I am hunting 
for CW signals or listening to broad activity.  I have the P3 also that helps 
out a bit but I usually do not close down my filter until I establish contact 
and have narrowed down to the other operator.  Then I will typically narrow 
down to about 350 Hz unless there is heavy activity causing QRM and then I will 
go even further.

If I do my hunt activity with a narrow filter I sometimes go over stations 
without even hearing them at all.  Although the P3 does help here, often there 
are stations that do not really register that high on the P3 to be easily 
visible with just a glance.

I agree that 2.4 KHz is too wide for CW but then I am not that familiar with 
the filters that are available and I so I am not sure whether the SSB is 
necessary or not.  I only pointed out that it was something that I had heard 
someone else doing.

phil, K7PEH


On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

> Phil,
> 
> For me, that is an awfully wide filter for CW.  I normally tune CW with a 
> filter set to 700 Hz.  a 2.4kHz wide filter hears a lot more of the band - 
> too much for me.
> 
> OTOH, there are some operators who like to use a wide filter to hear a lot of 
> what is going on around their frequency.  If you are in that class and have a 
> good "filter between the ears", then by all means use it that way.
> 
> I might point out one other disadvantage of using the wide filter for CW.  If 
> a strong signal is on the band say 1500 Hz away from the weaker signal you 
> are trying to copy, your mind may be able to easily separate the two, but 
> that strong signal is also activating the AGC and all signals in the passband 
> will be reduced in strength because of it.  That is why narrow "roofing 
> filters" are offered for the K3 - even though the DSP can create a narrow 
> filter, the hardware AGC is still responding to the strongest signal in the 
> passband.  The same argument applies to the K2.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
> On 2/8/2011 10:39 AM, Phil Hystad wrote:
>> A possible follow-up question --- one recommendation I received (indirectly 
>> out of band from this group) was that the SSB option was useful for the 
>> wider filter even if you do not plan to do SSB.  I have yet to read through 
>> all of the K2 manual (my next project) so I don't know much about the 
>> filters on the K2 so far.
>> 
>> 73, phil, K7PEH
>> 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to