Jim,
Thank you. Very persuading comparison.
Could you possibly add some modern SDR based rigs to the comparison?
73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brown" <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 6:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] WRTC 2014 - Congratulations, Elecraft!...(and
firmware update)
On 7/27/2014 3:19 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
I think that most are looking for something the K3 WRTC numbers are
not telling. I rather doubt that people went out and bought them for
the WRTC. With those kinds of numbers, the market had already made
its decision a long time ago.
Well, a certain portion of the market certainly has -- those need a high
performance rig for use under demanding conditions, including those of a
contest multi-op.
Egged on by a discussion on another email relector, I replotted ARRL test
data for key clicks and TX phase noise. I'm not going to stop there, but
the results so far tell a large part of the story.
k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf
Consider it a work in progress. ARRL publishes its data in the form of
graphs pretty small, and in some cases with too-wide ranging scales, so it
takes a lot of practice to get data within +/- 1.5 dB.
73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ua9...@gmail.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
