Don...
For sure, individual differences make for a big difference, both in the
rate of learning and the appropriateness of any one approach. I think we
all agree that "stretching your current copying speed" is the only way
to get faster. That's certainly my experience. I think my curiosity
comes down to how much "stretch" is the sweet spot [individual
difference aside]. Lots of stretch - few characters/words copied, versus
some stretch - most characters/words copied.
Speaking of individual factors... I was just practicing with Rufz and
noticed how long I "hang" on the first character which inevitably leads
to subsequent errors. So, I pushed myself to almost "ignore" the first
character and move right along. Overall error rate dropped
significantly. So, yes, lots going on. Nothing beats practicing, for
sure. Have a good day.
...robert
On 12/8/2015 01:46, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Robert,
What is missing is that each person learns at a different level and
pace. Each of us has our brains "wired differently".
In other words, what will work well for one person does not mean that it
will work well for all.
The quickest way to increasing CW speed is to get on the air and start
copying stations that stretch your current copying speed. In other
words, push yourself to higher speeds even if you cannot copy everything.
ARRL Code Practice is good up to 35 WPM, so try that, but on the air
conversations may drop you back to 25 WPM because of CW being sent
imperfectly.
When you can copy imperfect code (from a bug or keyer without perfect
spacing), then you have 'arrived'.
There is no substitute for practice - I advocate the 10 minutes a day at
trying to copy above your comfortable speed limit. More time than that
leads to frustration.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 12/7/2015 8:27 PM, Robert G Strickland wrote:
Bob's approach to increasing speed once a basic level of cw
proficiency has been achieved speak directly to my original thoughts
on the subject. Using a 5-letter group of random letters as the
practice message, then my question, in terms of Bob's approach, could
be stated as follows. Which is the quickest way to achieve some target
speed: to start the group at a speed where only one/two character are
correct, or to start where three/four are correct? I have no doubt
that with the regular and intense "concentration" that Bob advocates,
any method [within common sense limits] will result in higher copying
speed. That said, which starting point is going to get the operator to
the target speed the quickest? I don't know. Most of the folks who can
comfortably copy at speeds in excess of 30wpm seem to be from the "old
school" in that many learned in the military and have been at it a
very long time. I have to believe that their speed developed over time
with continuous usage/practice. Nothing beats time in the saddle. An
interesting "experiment" would be to take a bunch of hams who can copy
at 20wpm, divide them into the two approaches being discussed and
"measure" how long it takes each group to be comfortable at 30/35wpm.
A human factors issue is a person's task motivation and tolerance for
frustration. Starting with only one character correct out of five may
be pretty daunting for some and a piece of cake for others. But,
that's a separate issue.
--
Robert G Strickland, PhD ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net.usa
Syracuse, New York, USA
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
