Yours is anecdotal evidence based on small sample dizes. The  
manufacturers have the data for large numbers.

Dick,K6KR

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:08 PM, "Joe Subich, W4TV" <li...@subich.com> wrote:

>
>> and might result in higher reliability of that portion of the  
>> product?
>
> Not hardly ... last time I visited my mother, I repaired
> a pump seal in her 40 year old Westinghouse front loading
> washer.  The mechanical timer is still running perfectly
> after all these years ... and doing as many as 8 - 10
> loads a week while we were growing up.
>
> Those mechanical timer designs came from the commercial
> (coin operated) world where they did hundreds of loads
> (cycles) a week with nary a failure ... I maintained many
> of those machines while working for my dad in high school
> and college.
>
> The only advantage of the microprocessors are quick time
> to market and the ability to implement water/energy saving
> cycles demanded by the enviro-nuts at the cost of EMI
> pollution.
>
> The microprocessor controls certainly do not survive in
> a surge/spike/lightning rich environment nearly as well
> as the properly designed/sized mechanical timers.
>
> 73,
>
>   ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dick
>> Dievendorff
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:46 PM
>> To: 'Lee Buller'; 'Don Rasmussen'; 'Elecraft Reflector'
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: RFI from Front Loading Washing Machines
>>
>>
>> Perhaps because microcontroller-based control circuits might
>> be less expensive to manufacture than the mechanical devices
>> they replace, offer flexibility for "features" that are
>> deal-makers in a competitive marketplace, have shorter lead
>> time for changes, are less subject to mechanical failure
>> (wear) than the timers they replace, and might result in
>> higher reliability of that portion of the product?  These are
>> generally the reasons...
>>
>> Dick, K6KR
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Lee Buller
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:06 AM
>> To: Don Rasmussen; Elecraft Reflector
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: RFI from Front Loading Washing Machines
>>
>> Ok....
>>
>> There is something to be said about keeping with older
>> technology.  Why does a washer and dryer need to have a
>> microprocessor?  Timers have done the job for many years.
>>
>> Lee - K0WA
>>
>>
>> In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short
>> supply.  If you don't have any Common Sense - get some Common
>> Sense and use it.  If you can't find any Common Sense, ask
>> for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.  Is Common
>> Sense divine?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Don Rasmussen <wb8...@yahoo.com>
>> To: "elecraft@mailman.qth.net" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2009 9:23:45 PM
>> Subject: [Elecraft] OT: RFI from Front Loading Washing Machines
>>
>> I've been stuck for a couple years now with a Whirlpool Duet
>> front loading washing machine. The internal MCU and switcher
>> power supply trashes entire HF at S9 +10, I have to use an
>> MFJ-1026 to remedy this. Whirlpool Duet and Maytag Neptune
>> are notoroius for this with no known sure fire remedies at the  
>> device.
>>
>> Happily? The wife is NOT happy with the washer, seems it acts
>> more like a dishwasher with respect to cleaning power, that
>> it to say VERY light duty.
>>
>> A tiny amount of water tossed about some dirty socks, well
>> you get the idea.
>>
>>
>> I need suggestions on large capacity top loaders that habe a
>> clean bill of health in an HF environment.
>>
>> Please email your suggestion to wb8yqj at yahoo dot com so I
>> might "clean up" my act before the bands open for the Fall.
>>
>> TIA,
>> Don
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list:
>> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to