election-methods  

Messages by Date

• 2013/07/01 Re: [EM] [CES #9004] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Jameson Quinn
• 2013/07/01 Re: [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/07/01 Re: [EM] Outcome Design Goals David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/30 [EM] EMAV? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/30 [EM] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/30 [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/30 Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/29 [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Chris Benham
• 2013/06/29 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/29 Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/29 [EM] A candidate winning multiple seats. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/29 Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Markus Schulze
• 2013/06/29 Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/29 Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Markus Schulze
• 2013/06/29 Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/29 [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Alexander Kjäll
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls) Warren D. Smith (CRV cofounder, http://RangeVoting.org)
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/28 [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Chris Benham
• 2013/06/28 [EM] MAV on electowiki Chris Benham
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing* Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/28 [EM] Evaluative Majority Approval Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing* Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Absolutely new here Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/28 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/27 [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing* Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/27 [EM] a re: Warren Smith's surveys. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls) Warren D Smith
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] [CES #8982] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/27 [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Chris Benham
• 2013/06/27 [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
• 2013/06/27 [EM] MAV on electowiki Chris Benham
• 2013/06/27 [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Chris Benham
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform. Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/27 Re: [EM] [CES #8973] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/26 [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls) Warren D Smith
• 2013/06/26 [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
• 2013/06/26 Re: [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/26 [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/26 [EM] MAV on electowiki Chris Benham
• 2013/06/26 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/26 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/26 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/26 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/26 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/26 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8972] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8970] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8957] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] [CES #8955] Re: Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/25 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kevin Venzke
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Is it professional? David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 [EM] All systems of voting are probably deeply flawed Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Is it professional? David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Warren needs to double check his work. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kathy Dopp
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Chris Benham
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kevin Venzke
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion Chris Benham
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kathy Dopp
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kevin Venzke
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Kevin Venzke
• 2013/06/24 [EM] re James Gilmour David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? James Gilmour
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8924] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Fwd: Is it professional? David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 Re: [EM] Is it professional? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Is it professional? David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 [EM] random eg w. improved version of IRV3. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Why Random by itself doesn't cut it. David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/24 [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/23 Re: [EM] Subject: Here's what a random IRV election looks like Kathy Dopp
• 2013/06/22 [EM] Here's what a random IRV election looks like Warren D Smith
• 2013/06/22 Re: [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV! David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/22 Re: [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV! Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/22 [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV! David L Wetzell
• 2013/06/21 Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/20 Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/20 Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/20 Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/20 Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/20 Re: [EM] [CES #8854] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/19 [EM] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems Warren D Smith
• 2013/06/19 Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/19 Re: [EM] [CES #8844] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/19 Re: [EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems Warren D Smith
• 2013/06/19 Re: [EM] [CES #8843] Re: MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/19 [EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems Warren D Smith
• 2013/06/19 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] [CES #8834] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Chris Benham
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/18 [EM] MAV on electowiki Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] List issues? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/18 [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] List issues? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/18 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 [EM] List issues? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 [EM] Shout out of thanks Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8816] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/17 [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Chris Benham
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion Juho Laatu
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] [CES #8791] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Upper-Bucklin naming (was: Median systems, branding....) Andy Jennings
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Jameson Quinn
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2013/06/17 Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all? Benjamin Grant
• 2013/06/17 [EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion Benjamin Grant

• Earlier messages
• Later messages