Messages by Date
-
2012/06/13
Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 96, Issue 22
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/13
Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 96, Issue 22
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/13
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Markus Schulze
-
2012/06/12
Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 96, Issue 22
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/12
Re: [EM] IIAC. Juho: Census re-districting instead of PR for allocating seats to districts.
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/12
[EM] IIAC. Juho: Census re-districting instead of PR for allocating seats to districts.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/12
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof - maybe I see the thought
Kevin Venzke
-
2012/06/12
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Kevin Venzke
-
2012/06/12
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Markus Schulze
-
2012/06/11
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/11
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Kevin Venzke
-
2012/06/11
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/06/11
Re: [EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Markus Schulze
-
2012/06/11
[EM] Herve Moulin's proof not really a proof
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/10
Re: [EM] Largest-Remainder
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/10
Re: [EM] Declaration's policy on single-mark ballots (was Re: Do any of you have any thoughts about California's top-two primary?)
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/10
Re: [EM] Declaration's policy on single-mark ballots (was Re: Do any of you have any thoughts about California's top-two primary?)
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/10
Re: [EM] Declaration's policy on single-mark ballots (was Re: Do any of you have any thoughts about California's top-two primary?)
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/10
Re: [EM] Declaration's policy on single-mark ballots (was Re: Do any of you have any thoughts about California's top-two primary?)
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/10
[EM] Declaration's policy on single-mark ballots (was Re: Do any of you have any thoughts about California's top-two primary?)
Steve Eppley
-
2012/06/09
Re: [EM] Throwing my hat into the ring, possibly to get trampled
Kevin Venzke
-
2012/06/09
[EM] Differentness or similarity of Republicans and Democrats
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/09
Re: [EM] Throwing my hat into the ring, possibly to get trampled
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/09
Re: [EM] Throwing my hat into the ring, possibly to get trampled
Kevin Venzke
-
2012/06/09
[EM] California's adoption of Runoff
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/09
Re: [EM] Throwing my hat into the ring, possibly to get trampled
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/09
Re: [EM] Throwing my hat into the ring, possibly to get trampled
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/06/09
Re: [EM] PR solutions
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] Throwing my hat into the ring, possibly to get trampled
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] PR solutions
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/08
[EM] Throwing my hat into the ring, possibly to get trampled
Nicholas Buckner
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] Largest-Remainder
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] PR solutions
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] Do any of you have any thoughts about California's top-two primary?
Richard Fobes
-
2012/06/08
[EM] Typo
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] PR solutions (was: Gerrymandering solutions).
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] Regarding the districting solutions. My proposal in greater detail.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] PR solutions
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] PR solutions
Ken B
-
2012/06/08
Re: [EM] PR solutions (was: Gerrymandering solutions).
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/07
[EM] Regarding the districting solutions. My proposal in greater detail.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/07
Re: [EM] PR solutions (was: Gerrymandering solutions).
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/07
Re: [EM] PR solutions (was: Gerrymandering solutions).
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/07
Re: [EM] PR solutions (was: Gerrymandering solutions).
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/07
Re: [EM] PR solutions (was: Gerrymandering solutions).
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/07
[EM] Bob--PR reply
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/07
[EM] Do any of you have any thoughts about California's top-two primary?
Adrian Tawfik
-
2012/06/07
Re: [EM] Gerrymandering solutions.
Bob Richard
-
2012/06/07
Re: [EM] PR solutions (was: Gerrymandering solutions).
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/06
Re: [EM] Gerrymandering solutions.
Paul Kislanko
-
2012/06/06
Re: [EM] Gerrymandering solutions.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/05
Re: [EM] Gerrymandering solutions.
Ted Stern
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] Another reason why Greens won't vote Dem due to previous count results.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] Gerrymandering solutions.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
James Gilmour
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] Another reason why Greens won't vote Dem, due to previous count results.
Paul Kislanko
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
James Gilmour
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/04
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
James Gilmour
-
2012/06/03
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/03
[EM] In Lomax's example, what if voters _do_ believe p(D)=p(R)=.5?
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/03
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/03
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
robert bristow-johnson
-
2012/06/03
[EM] One more thing: If voters just assumed p(R) = p(D)=.5
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/03
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/03
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/03
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/03
[EM] Lomax's example has a fallacy. Bruce's argument is ridiculously, blatantly fallacious.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/02
[EM] Regarding my reply to Lomax's example
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/02
Re: [EM] Approval and Condorcet
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/02
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/02
Re: [EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/02
Re: [EM] Approval and Condorcet
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/02
[EM] My summary of the recent discussion
Juho Laatu
-
2012/06/02
[EM] Approval and Condorcet
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/06/02
[EM] Addendum to Lomax reply
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/02
[EM] Why does Approval go to the voter-median? Median-estimate strategy.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/02
Re: [EM] Another reason why Greens won't vote Dem, due to previous count results.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/06/01
Re: [EM] Another reason why Greens won't vote Dem, due to previous count results.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2012/06/01
Re: [EM] Another reason why Greens won't vote Dem, due to previous count results.
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/31
[EM] Another reason why Greens won't vote Dem, due to previous count results.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/31
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] Unusual request - $20 reward
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
robert bristow-johnson
-
2012/05/29
[EM] Borda pr
Ross
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] Unusual request - $20 reward
Fred Gohlke
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] Approval strategy: never approve challengers
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] Approval strategy: never approve challengers
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/29
[EM] Unusual request - $20 reward
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/05/29
[EM] Approval strategy: never approve challengers
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] Addenda to "What will happen..." post
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] Juho, optimists.
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/29
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/28
Re: [EM] Addenda to "What will happen..." post
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/28
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/28
[EM] Juho, optimists.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/28
[EM] Addenda to "What will happen..." post
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/28
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/27
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/27
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/27
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/27
Re: [EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/27
[EM] What happens when Approval doesn't let you vote Favorite>Dem>Repub?
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/27
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/26
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/26
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/26
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/25
Re: [EM] SODA terminology: opinions wanted.
Andy Jennings
-
2012/05/25
[EM] SODA terminology: opinions wanted.
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/05/25
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/25
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/24
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/24
[EM] Co-operation/defection in perspective
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/24
Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/23
[EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/23
Re: [EM] full-ranking SODA: FBC compliant
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/05/23
[EM] full-ranking SODA: FBC compliant
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/05/22
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/22
[EM] Two completely different kinds of voting reforms. ICT vs Condorcet.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/22
Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/22
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/22
Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/21
Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/21
Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/21
[EM] Typo. Plurality strategy, not Approval strategy, is a difficult problem.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/21
[EM] Kristofer, contd.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/21
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/21
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2012/05/21
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/20
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/20
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/19
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/19
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/19
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
robert bristow-johnson
-
2012/05/19
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/19
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/19
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/19
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/18
Re: [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/18
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/18
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/18
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/18
Re: [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/17
Re: [EM] Concerns of KM & RF. Approval, Condorcet & ICT strategy. Reform schedule.
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/17
[EM] Clarification and correction about u/a strategy
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/17
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/17
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/16
[EM] Concerns of KM & RF. Approval, Condorcet & ICT strategy. Reform schedule.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/16
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/16
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/16
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] C/D resistant Condorcet methods.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/15
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/14
[EM] C/D resistant Condorcet methods.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] Smith-Top
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/14
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/13
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/13
[EM] Ok, the subject here is a waste of time.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/12
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
robert bristow-johnson
-
2012/05/12
Re: [EM] To Condorcetists:
Paul Kislanko
-
2012/05/12
[EM] To Condorcetists:
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/11
[EM] Completely different reasons for and purposes of method advocacy.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/11
[EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC.
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/11
[EM] New popularization article
RĂ©mi
-
2012/05/10
[EM] Comments on a few things said by Richard & Robert, May 10, '12
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/10
[EM] Smith-Top
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/09
Re: [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/09
Re: [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"
Kevin Venzke
-
2012/05/09
Re: [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2012/05/08
Re: [EM] ? about your reply to Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/08
[EM] CC, Co-operation/Defection, definitions of Approval and VoteFair
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/08
[EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion"
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/08
Re: [EM] [Urgent] Information about M. Schulze
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/05/08
Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria
Dave Ketchum
-
2012/05/08
Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria
Jameson Quinn
-
2012/05/07
Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/07
Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria
Juho Laatu
-
2012/05/07
[EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria
Richard Fobes
-
2012/05/07
[EM] Richard reply, 5/7/12
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/07
[EM] Articles for Democracy Chronicles
Richard Fobes
-
2012/05/07
[EM] Could we work on enactment-feasibility instead of jealous, self-serving infighting?
Michael Ossipoff
-
2012/05/06
[EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff
Adrian Tawfik