On Aug 9, 2007, at 6:41 , Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
In any case, simple Range N is exactly like having N votes to cast,
in an Approval election, and the one with the most votes wins.
There is nothing in this about "utilities" or "ratings."
It happens, however, that you can think about Range that way if you
want. It can be used to maximize social utility, and it does a
pretty good job even if most voters vote the extremes.
Maximizing social utility refers to giving sincere utilities in the
ballots. You seem to be recommending the voters to primarily do so,
and in addition to that accept the Approval style voting as a
secondary less good option. With this I think we are back in the
original claim that Range may create a mess if some voters vote
sincerely (and maybe are guided to do so) and some strategically.
Juho
___________________________________________________________
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" The Wall Street Journal
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
