Good Morning, Kristofer

re: (with regard to whether we have the stomach to require that
     legislators be maintained at a government installation,
     protected from direct access by lobbyists, to prevent the
     subornation of those we select to represent us in our
     government.)

Like you, I don't know if it will happen, but we should consider it. We don't know how or when our political processes will change. They may, as most rational people would prefer, evolve slowly. If so, the need or lack thereof, for such a course will manifest itself. On the other hand, change could come quickly or violently. In such a case, given our knowledge of the means by which the original modern representative democracy has been degraded, it is possible such a remedy could be imposed. In either case, it is an option we should study and openly discuss.

  [Footnote on quick or violent political change.
   We must note that, for such a change to benefit the people,
   it must transcend party lines.  The American Revolution was a
   broad-based revolt, prosecuted by very diverse interests not
   least of which were geographical, maritime, industrial and
   agricultural.  When such a change is partisan-inspired (like
   the Fascist Party in Italy, the Communist Party in China and
   Russia, and the National Socialist Party in Germany), the
   change redounds to the benefit of the party, not the people.]



re: "What I mean by radical transparency is not transparency of
     the candidates' thoughts, but rather an as extensive
     disclosure of the information that is part of the process."

Thank you for the link to the Wikipedia entry on 'radical transparency'. It seems to me what you referred to as 'the continuation phase' of Practical Democracy, the phase during which constituents guide or direct their representatives, is precisely what is meant by radical transparency. Viewed from the perspective that political actions "are considered to lack legitimacy until a clear, radically transparent decision has been made concerning them", gives the idea of imposing 'rule by constituents' (where those who select a public official participate in the decisions made by the official) rational appeal. The method certainly embodies the means by which it can be done. And, of course, the internet provides the means for cheap, convenient and pervasive implementation.

Fred
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to