David,

Have been (still am) out of the office testing this week.

I am sorry to say that I cannot provide hard data to support my comments. That experience was two lifetimes ago at a different employer. It happened on more than one product model and on more than one of each model. I do know that we would make 50 discharges at each test point. And, there were more than ten test points on each model. Not every test point would exhibit the problem, but those that did were consistent, something like 60% of discharges would cause the system display to scramble. The peak failure voltage was around 1.8 kV, with only a very few failures at 4 kV and none at 8 or 15 kV. All were in contact mode.

This was all engineering work prior to official test house testing. We identified the problems and made changes and re-tested. Once we got all tests to pass, we would go for the official test. We had several of these type of problems. Once was the scrambled (actually went black) LCD display. Solved by shielding the cable to the display and termination resistors on the display PCB. Another time was black lines in the recorded output (film recorder products). This was corrected by proper grounding of the I/O connector shell. Third time was system hang-up. If I recall this one correctly, we added decoupling caps to chassis ground at the I/O connector on the mother board. In all cases, the problems were at mid level tests, usually 2 or 4 kV, rarely at 8 kV, and never at 15 kV.

Scott


At 08:33 PM 6/10/02 -0500, you wrote:
Dear Scott,

(1)
I have looked at quite a bit of literature that plots

   Failure propatibility   vs.  Stress level in contact mode like testing

and have seen very few none-monotonic EUTs that show the none-monotonic behavior over a larger voltage range.

(2)
In my five year test practise at HP, I have only seen one EUT that failed at lower levels and passed at higher levels in contact mode.


If you have data that shows"As others have said, I have seen numerous failures at less than the maximum required test voltage while the same system passes at the max required voltage." please share that data with me if it is in contact mode and if the number of discharges at each level is large enough to obtain an acceptable confidence level.

Regards

   David Pommerenke



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
    majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
    unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
    Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
    Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
    Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
   http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
   Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to