Emissions from a laptop are naturally (without suppression) on the order of
10 uV/m to 100s of uV/m.  1000 uV/m would represent at least a 20 dB outage
at frequencies that could possibly interfere with sensor electronics.  The
coupling is lossy: 1 mV/m will generate far less than 1 mV signal in the
electronics, and this at rf.  Does anyone really see this as a remotely
possible mechanism?  I don't.

----------
>From: "Robert Macy" <m...@california.com>
>To: "Pettit, Ghery" <ghery.pet...@intel.com>, "'James Collum'"
<james.col...@usa.alcatel.com>, <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>
>Subject: Re: EMC-related safety issues
>Date: Thu, Jan 3, 2002, 3:25 PM
>

>
> Perhaps, it merely interfered with the "sensor" electronics, not the true
> magnetic field that was being sensed.
>
>                      - Robert -
>
>        Robert A. Macy, PE    m...@california.com
>        408 286 3985              fx 408 297 9121
>        AJM International Electronics Consultants
>        619 North First St,   San Jose, CA  95112
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Pettit, Ghery <ghery.pet...@intel.com>
>     To: 'James Collum' <james.col...@usa.alcatel.com>;
> emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>
>     Date: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:46 AM
>     Subject: RE: EMC-related safety issues
>
>
>     I still have a hard time believing it was a compass that was affected by
> a laptop computer.  ADF indication, could be.  VOR, maybe.  Magnetic
> compass?  I wouldn't want a magnetic source that strong in my lap!  My belt
> buckle would be stuck to it.  There is quite a distance between a magnetic
> compass in the cockpit of an airliner and anything a passenger is carrying.
> Not so in a Cessna 172, but in a DC-10?
>
>     Ghery Pettit
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: James Collum [mailto:james.col...@usa.alcatel.com]
>     Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:47 AM
>     To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>     Subject: Re: EMC-related safety issues
>
>
>
>
>         *********
>         A routine flight over Dallas-Fort Worth was disrupted when one of
> the compasses suddenly shifted 10 degrees to the right.  The pilot asked if
> any passenger was operating an electronic device,  and finding that a laptop
> computer had just been turned on requested that it be turned off,  whereupon
> the compass returned to normal. Following RTCA guidelines the pilot
> requested that the laptop be turned on again 10 minutes later,  when the
> compass error returned.
>         Ref: Compliance Engineering (European edition)  Nov/Dec 1996 p12
>         *********
>
>     I am fascinated by this amazing story (which must surely be an urban
> myth) and went in search of more info on the internet.
>     I had never heard of the RTCA ( a private corporation)  before, but
> noticed via their web site that you have to be a member company (i.e. pay)
> to receive the wisdom that it contains.  Aviation is merely a hobby of mine
> but I'm interested in reading a copy of the RTCA's DO-233/214 and 196
> documents without shelling out hundreds for the privilege, can anyone
> advise? Also does anyone know what recommendations have they made to
> modifying FAR 91.21 (as per their web site).
>     In reading this again, I'm curious as to how the pilot would have known
> about a private companies convoluted guideline for fault finding on errant
> radio direction equipment involving locating industrious passengers and
> commandeering their computers at 10 minute intervals.
>     Surely he would have done what any professional engineer would do, beat
> or kick the 10 degree error out of the RDF equipment?
>     Or maybe just wonder to him/herself about how strange things happen in
> the Dallas Fort Worth area?
>
>     Tounge in cheek, my comments and not those of my employer etc.
>
>     Jim
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>      Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>      Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
> messages are imported into the new server.
> 

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
     Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to