In message <ca8140fd.bec28%ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>, dated Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> writes:
>To my knowledge, there has been no confusion about this topic since >1993. We are noticing this in other standards areas. 18 years on, most of the people have changed, and what was agreed and why is becoming unknown. This is one reason why I have taken steps to put 'preservation orders' (called 'stabilized status') on legacy IEC TC100 standards. Other standards committees could, with advantage, follow suit. In SC77A, we actually wrote a history - IEC 61000-1-4 - so that 'why' would not be forgotten. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK When I point to a star, please look at the star, not my finger. The star will be more interesting. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
