In message <021c01cdf279$f5b33720$e119a560$@acbcert.com>, dated Mon, 14
Jan 2013, Michael Derby <micha...@acbcert.com> writes:
I believe one of the situations that arises from the NLF is that the
requirements of each Directive are being harmonised. This often means
looking at all the Directives, finding the 'most strict requirement'
and then applying it to all the others.
That is neither logical nor reasonable. Shall we have all the special
requirements of the Machinery and Automotive Directives applied to toys,
for example?
So, you couldn't have this requirement for the Toy Safety Directive and
then say that it doesn't apply to other Directives, because that would
not be in line with the Directive harmonisation and NLF.
If that is the official view, it is even more insane than anything
previously emitted from Brussels.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
