Are there more than one possible solution to the kinematics equations
you are using here.  I remember years ago when K&T showed a Hexapod at
IMTS.  Every so often the control would pick the wrong solution and rip
the ballscrew out of a nut.

I know that the NIST Hexapod software picked the solution closest to
current position. 

Rayh


On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:49 -0400, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> 100,000 iterations sounds like way too many. I suggst that you use a
> variable number of iterations based on some convergence criterion.
> 
> Also, if you save the answer from the previously calculated forward
> kinematics and use that as the initial value of the  new calculation you
> will be able to save a considerable amount of time. That takes advantage of
> the fact that the motion at each iteration is a relatively small distance.
> 
> Ken
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mark Kenny Products Company, LLC
> 55 Main Street       Voice: (888)ISO-SEVO (888)476-7386
> Newtown, CT 06470                    Fax: (203)426-9138
> http://www.MarkKenny.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jros
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 12:56 PM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: [Emc-users] Debugging parallel kinematics: how to printf in
> dmesg?
> 
> 
> Hello!.
> 
> We are implementing a 6 dgf kinematics for a parallel manipulator.
> 
> (see http://imac/parallel/images/argazkiak/img_4336.jpg for a photograph
> of the machine without the head)
> 
> We are using as a template genhexkins.c file so that compiling and
> launching is not a problem.
> 
> We have provided new implementations for forward and inverse kinematics.
> 
> And we are continuously hanging ./scripts/emc hexapod-sim. Well, the
> computers gets frozen, and we have to reset it!!!!!.
> 
> I've compiled the kinematics outside emc providing a main, and it seems
> that we have done a correct programing.
> 
> Forwardkinematics requires a newton raphson iteration, much longer to
> compute compared with Inverse kinematics.
> 
> A 9 newton raphson iteration calculation requires on a 100000 iteration
> average a calculation time of 0.000797 secs
> in our computer.
> 
> As emc hangs we've tried to use trivkins to replace the forward and
> inverse kins in genhexkins.c and it works ok, it does not hangs.
> 
> As a last try, we have forced our kinematics to output the trivkins
> kinematics, but forcing it to internaly deal with all the computations
> of our model (we are forcing 9 newton-raphson iterations), in order to
> see if it is a "too time consuming subrutine" problem.
> 
> It works, it seems it works slower that with the surplus of
> computations.
> 
> But we are eye blinded to to see what is happening in fact within our
> subrutine, how many iterations? output values? and input values?.
> 
> Being the kinematics a real time module, I presume that printf debuging
> will not work, more if the aplication freezes the computer.
> 
> I presume the only posibility is to use dmesg, but I don't know how to
> send output so that I can see what is happening with dmesg
> 
> What can I do?, or where can I read about dealing with this type of real
> time subrutine debugging?.
> 
> I think I can try to debug using dmesg approach, using a working
> kinematics -so the computer does not get freezed- (as the trivkins
> approach mentioned before) to see what are the subrutines called and the
> values of the variables passed to them, and hopefully discover what is
> going on.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> Javier Ros & Aitor Plaza
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to