El mié, 19-09-2007 a las 09:23 -0500, Ray Henry escribió:
> Are there more than one possible solution to the kinematics equations
> you are using here.  I remember years ago when K&T showed a Hexapod at
> IMTS.  Every so often the control would pick the wrong solution and rip
> the ballscrew out of a nut.
> 
> I know that the NIST Hexapod software picked the solution closest to
> current position. 
> 
> Rayh

Yes you are right, kinematics has 2 solutions, the one shown in the
photograph
http://www.imac.unavarra.es/parallel/images/argazkiak/pimg_4416.jpg
and another one that will put the head and arms facing upwards.

For us inverse kinematics is analitical, and we can choose the downwards
facing solution without problem. In the case of forward kinematics it
can be the case that the system reaches such a meaningless solution.

Nevertheless I think i not our case: When into to the emc interface,
joints and pos gets initializated to 0,0,0,0,0,0, and we have ajusted
our kinematics for it to be a solution, so as newton raphson iteration
converges to the closest solution, and provides that while the systems
moves previous solution is close to the next one, is almost imposible to
have such a problem.

We have not see right now.

Nevertheless, your comments have made me to think that for security
reasons it would be interestin to put a couple of "if" cluses that
check twice that the computed position is a downward facing one.

This will put another layer of security, over the security provided by
the limit switches.

Yesterday afternoon we moved the real machine, using the new kinematics,
it moved almost right, despite rotations where made in the oposite
direction.

I think there is a litle problem joint numbering and conections.

More on this, and I expect a video also in our next mail.

Thanks to all for your incredible help :))

Javier and Aitor



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to