Peter

Thankyou so much for sharing your trials and discovery.  Such knowledge
will save a poor beginner like myself much precious sanity.

Regards

Cal Grandy
Vermont USA

 Hello Gentlemen,
> this is mainly to the EMC developers.
>
> Since January I have tried to get my steppers run smoothly and evenly. I
> wrote several mails to the list on this problem, but received little echo.
> Now I seem to be near to the solution which might be of interest to the
> developing team.
>
> My steppers rattled and lost steps regardless of the conditions I gave
> them. I've changed almost everything in the setup to get the motors run
> correctly. Result: No cure for the problem of "rattling steppers loosing
> steps" (name of my former thread).
>
> - I tried 4 different motherboards from 350 MHz Intel to 2.4 GHz AMD
> - I tried 3 newly installed harddisks with two different live CD's
> downloaded 2008 and 2009
> - I tried running EMC from the live disks directly
> - I tried all this with two different driver boards
> - I tested all axis independently and in common
> - I made a LED test plug for the printer cable to visualize the timing
> with
> little sockets to access the signals with a scope probe
> - I changed the order of pulse and direction output at the pins of the
> parport
> - I commented all "reset" lines in .hal to switch off doublestep like I
> was
> told
> - I varied the parameters of steplen and stepspace in .hal up and down to
> extreme values
> - I had a friend (informatics expert) do all this again to exclude my
> person as the source of trouble (which is the most likely cause of
> computer
> problems)
> - I looked at the pulses at the parport with two different oscilloscopes
> and found that the pulses came rather irregularly (the old scope couldn't
> even trigger it).
>
> Finally I noticed: only 3 successive pulses (5 us) came with a constant
> pause in between, the fourth pause  was twice as long which caused the
> motors to dance a 5/4 waltz no matter what speed I chose. This could be
> influenced only by varying the microstep rate from half to 1/4 or 1/8
> step.
> The longer pause seemed to appear then as the eighth or the sixteenth one
> correspondingly (hard to get a steady picture for counting them on the
> scope).
>
> To put it shortly: I found no solution and came to the conclusion that
> nobody in the world ever tried running steppers with EMC stepconf because
> I
> never heard anything about it and nobody answered to my mails about it.
> All
> this troubleshooting took me about two months since I sometimes have to
> earn some money, too, and almost all my nerves.
>
> Note that I did all this with the "test axis" function of stepconf because
> this is a very convenient way to see the result of parameter variations
> immediately. Now, yesterday evening it occurred to me that stepconf
> apparently ignores settings in .hal and .ini files that I made with the
> editor when going beyond its apparent default limits. I made a micky mouse
> G-Code list and tested this with axis instead of stepconf, ad lo and
> behold! the problem was solved! (A little time jitter was still present
> but
> bearable).
>
> I resisted my instant urge to dance on the table only because there was no
> space on any table. Can you imagine, by the way, what my house looks like
> meanwhile? My wife told me that if I wouldn't get all the equipment
> mentioned out of the way (I piled it up in 3 rooms), she would, which
> could
> become a serious case - wars originated from lesser causes.;-))
>
> Seriously: After all my efforts I am inclined to exclude all other causes
> of the misbehaviour than stepconf. Is it really true that nobody ever
> reported problems with the "test axis" function of stepconf? Maybe it has
> been fixed in 2.3? I have the impression that it must be a minor bug when
> counting the pulses because there is a connection with the microstep
> feature.
>
> I am aware that expositions now have caught all the attention of the gang.
> But when NAMES and EMC expo are over, please someone would have a look at
> this?
>
> Thank you for the learning
>
> Peter Blodow
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to