2012/3/15 Roger Holmquist <ro...@abcnc.se>: > > Hello everybody! > > Have just got reason to join the CNC-developing community. > Considering LinuxCNC as a professional machine control system > replacing older control systems versions from FANUC, Heidenhahn, > Siemens etc
I think that Youtube has enough videos to prove that LinuxCNC is perfectly suited for such a task. > One observation is that trajectory planning seem to be incomplete. Could You, please, explain in more detail with some facts/arguments? > There is also a need to find reliable HW for machine-interfacing. Pico Systems and Mesa provide hardware that has been widely used and provides excellent performance. I have been using them for my own and for my clients' machines for some time already and I have no reason to complain about the overall reliability and stability. I have had some issues with particular pieces of hardware, that have been successfully resolved, so I do not see any reason for such a statement You provided. Anders posted a link to wiki page, where additional supported hardware options are mentioned, so I think that I am not the only one, who would like to find out Your reasons for such an opinion. Viesturs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
