> The complexity does come in because there are so many of them: NXP,
> ST, TI, Broadcom, Marvell and Atmel, each one a little different; but
> if you are looking for low price/complexity, just stick to one of
> them, for instance NXP LPC series.
>

8 pin DIP?!  Does anyone release (new) though hole parts anymore? :)  SMT
is just something everyone has to get use to.  Its not going away.  I don't
mind the leadless pkgs but we shy away from BGAs so far.  Rework is
difficult and we have no xray for inspection.  As I told you when you were
here, the IR DirectFETs is the closest thing we use to hidden pads but it
has huge contacts.  You can even do a fair job of them by hand squirting
paste and throwing in the reflow oven.

Agreed, each processor vendor has different peripherals.  The CMSIS
libraries abstract that.  Its not 100% universal (yet), but you can spend a
little time fixing and abstracting the HAL as much as you need.  The cores
are 100% identical though.  We've had very little trouble moving stuff
to/from a M0 to M4.  We're using the M0 as smart I2C I/O expanders w/ a M4
motherboard and the com code is the same in both.  So yes, still a little
different but 1000x more common than different processor families.

Stephen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to