2012/4/21 Jon Elson <[email protected]>: > Stuart Stevenson wrote: >> Would a read ahead of 1000 lines be more time consuming than the NURB >> calculation? > A modest NURBS surface could be scanned pretty quickly to find the sharp > edges, > if any. 1000 block lookahead may not be necessary, even 100 block would > probably > suffice in most machines.
Not sure. I have seen arcs consisting of tiny G1 moves that are really tiny - around 0,01 mm. 100 lines would be 1 mm. I did little calcs - moving with 100 mm/s (6000 mm/min) and with acceleration of 1000 mm/s^2 (0,1G) it will take 5 mm to fully stop. Viesturs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
