On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Don Stanley <dstanley1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It all depends on what you are used to in that regard. M$ is no >> slouch when it comes to changing the look, feel, and workability of >> the desktop. Look at the progression from Win98, to ME, to XP, to >> 2000, to Vista, to Win 7 and now Win 8. It's not just from the >> administrative point of view, it's from the user point of view. I >> like my applications to run, to be secure, and have a safe, secure OS >> wrapping the entire thing. Being able to recompile or load updated >> apps so that they have the correct hooks into the OS so I don't have >> to worry about a piece of legacy software that I like either not >> compatible with, or works but not secure within the new OS is just >> somewhere I really don't want to go. And that's from both an >> administrative (which I do for a living) and a user (which I'm also) >> point of view. >> >> Mark >> > > > For me it is simple; > If you want job security and a big system budget go with M$. > If you want System security and a smaller job, go with Linux. Dunno about the job security bit. I've been a Unix system and network admin for close to 20 years now. ;-) Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
