On the water jet site (I want to think it was CMC, but memory is hazy) the 
comparison between their full path pre scanning and short distance lookahead 
was that the full pre scan could adjust to things like a long straight followed 
by a series of curves and short straights by slowing down to a best possible 
average speed through the twisty section, still managing to speed up a bit 
where possible.

Short distance lookahead is always getting surprised by the next curve, causing 
rapid attempts to change speed and resulting in lower cut quality and more wear 
and tear on the machine.

Compare it to a skilled race car driver who has made a practice lap and 
committed every twist and turn to memory, planning out all the gear changes and 
how fast to go at all points along the course.

Short range lookahead is like a semi-skilled driver who has never been on the 
track before and starts the race without even a practice lap. He can see a turn 
or two ahead and has the skill to not run off the track, but will try to go as 
fast as possible all the time and is always having to stomp on the brake at 
every turn.

The skilled driver maintains a smooth speed profile through a chicane while the 
amateur comes screaming in, hits the brakes hard and has to putt through the 
curves slowly to avoid spinning off the track. 

The driver who runs the course before the race ends up lapping the track 
faster, with less wear on the consumables.

So why not have a "practice lap" simulation that can generate a complete 
accel/speed/decel profile for a toolpath then feed that data to LinuxCNC?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to