--- On Fri, 5/31/13, andy pugh <[email protected]> wrote: > From: andy pugh <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Adjustable Kinnematics? > To: [email protected], "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, May 31, 2013, 6:51 PM > On 1 June 2013 01:45, dave <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > In that vein I heard a story about a piece being > machined at Hanford. > > The dwg called for a hole xxx in dia yyy in depth > within this very > > complex part. The machinist did it as called out but > the drawing was > > wrong. > > "Drawing wrong" can lead to long arguments. I have made > drawings like > that. I had 1mm tolerance on several things, and .01 on a > very thin web. They machined to nominal dimensions….
Somewhere on the web (I can't find it now) is a hilarious RFQ rejection form with checkboxes for many reasons why a shop can't or won't do a job. One of them is something like Zero or negative wall thickness. We don't care if your part is gone when we're done machining, we're still getting paid. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
