On Monday 06 April 2015 14:12:31 John Alexander Stewart wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Finally fixed the Oldham couplers for my X/Y axes on my latest build,
> and was measuring backlash for inserting in the LinuxCNC ini file.
>
> This is for a "G0704" style of mill conversion, using one of those
> kits from the old KeilingCNC place.
>
> X/Y/Z is 0.1mm, 0.24mm 0.1mm  or, 2.5 thou, 9 thou, 2.5 thou.

The 2.5 thou is a bit loose, bigger balls in the nut perhaps?

The 9 thou Y indicates either the thrust bearing at the solidly anchored 
end of the screw is duff, or perhaps not properly assembled.  I was able 
to fix one of those in a cheap 16mmx5 Chinese screw on my toy lathes z 
by padding the outer ring separation with some half thou alu foil shims. 
Several of them stacked. Tricky to cut too.  Seems to be holding up so 
far.

> Is this considered "ok" or "out of range"?
>
> I've put these figures in my mill ini file, and it's currently running
> the X and Y axes back and forth; will measure it again after a bit of
> wearing in.
>
> Any thoughts/comments?
>
> (as an aside, Andy Pugh's feedback for spindle soft-gearing works a
> treat - thank you again Andy)
>
> John.

Let us know what you found John, it helps the next person with a similar 
problem.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to