just for correctness: 0.1mm is about 4 thou, not 2.5 ...
Cheers,
Karl
(a traveller between the metric and imperial parts of this planet)


Am 07.04.2015 um 07:01 schrieb dave:
>
>
> On 04/06/2015 12:29 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 06 April 2015 14:12:31 John Alexander Stewart wrote:
>>> Hi all;
>>>
>>> Finally fixed the Oldham couplers for my X/Y axes on my latest build,
>>> and was measuring backlash for inserting in the LinuxCNC ini file.
>>>
>>> This is for a "G0704" style of mill conversion, using one of those
>>> kits from the old KeilingCNC place.
>>>
>>> X/Y/Z is 0.1mm, 0.24mm 0.1mm  or, 2.5 thou, 9 thou, 2.5 thou.
>> The 2.5 thou is a bit loose, bigger balls in the nut perhaps?
>>
>> The 9 thou Y indicates either the thrust bearing at the solidly anchored
>> end of the screw is duff, or perhaps not properly assembled.  I was able
>> to fix one of those in a cheap 16mmx5 Chinese screw on my toy lathes z
>> by padding the outer ring separation with some half thou alu foil shims.
>> Several of them stacked. Tricky to cut too.  Seems to be holding up so
>> far.
>>
>>> Is this considered "ok" or "out of range"?
>>>
>>> I've put these figures in my mill ini file, and it's currently running
>>> the X and Y axes back and forth; will measure it again after a bit of
>>> wearing in.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts/comments?
>>>
>>> (as an aside, Andy Pugh's feedback for spindle soft-gearing works a
>>> treat - thank you again Andy)
>>>
>>> John.
>> Let us know what you found John, it helps the next person with a similar
>> problem.
>>
>> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> I've been dealing with a loose Y axis on my cinci contourmaster; this
> machine
> is set up so one can turn either the ballscrew or the servo motor to adjust
> position. The so-called lock on the servo end was loose and so the backlash
> was self-adjusting;out to unusable amounts.   Ugh. I'm in the process of
> a dual fix ... complete rebuild the mount for the ballscrew so I can
> lock it down tight.... and add a 10" 5 um glass scale for reference.
> For now I will connect just the glass scale with it's attendant tuning
> problems (just not quite enough counts) but the future holds a config
> where P and D are fed from a 40K count/in encoderon the ballscrew and I
> is driven by the glass scale in like manner to Stu's big machine.
>
> Some years ago I was asked to fab a bunch of blocks for a US First
> robotics team. Set them up and ran as a batch.
> When finished I miked them to see how I'd done. SD was 0.001 but the
> dimensions were all large by about 2 thou. This on a machine (mazak)
> with 0.0025 backlash on both X and Y. Appropriate cutter comp might have
> landed these in the right range if it made a difference. ;-) Just
> personal experience.
>
> Dave
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to