On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 11:52 PM Rafael Skodlar <ra...@linwin.com> wrote:

> LinuxCNC is not only about RT kernel as some threads seem to spin around
> to no end. It seems that Chris understood my original post the best.
> What he pointed out is use of modern technologies that makes it possible
> to create advanced systems we could only dream about years ago.
>
> It's clear you want something other than linuxcnc and also seem to be
unable to contribute anything other than ideas.  Ideas are great, but in
isolation they are not so great.  Reminds me of Elizabeth Holmes saying she
invented a time machine when she was 9.  What she did was draw a picture of
a "time machine."  Not quite the same thing.

Refactoring linuxcnc is a big job and the resulting product would take many
years to work as well as linuxcnc.  If it were a simple matter, someone
would have done it.  That's partially where machinekit came from, but it
seems to have fizzled a little.

At its core, linuxcnc is a machine controller.  It is very flexible, but
what it does best is control one machine.  It's a very useful piece of
software.  As long as there are computers with i/o that works and the
mechanisms that make linuxcnc possible exist in the operating system, it's
modern enough.

 It's not like a big change like this would attract a number of developers
committed to a multi-year uncompensated work with minimal payoff.
Eric Keller
Boalsburg, Pennsylvania

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to