> On Thursday 23 July 2020 13:34:48 Nicklas SB Karlsson wrote:
> 
> > > On Thursday 23 July 2020 07:53:45 andy pugh wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 12:47, Nicklas SB Karlsson
> > > >
> > > > <nicklas.karlsso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I wonder what effect could be had by rate-limiting the PID
> > > > > > output to the motors?
> > > > >
> > > > > Integrator should ideally have anti-windup.
> > > >
> > > > Anti-windup is a little different.
> > > >
> > > > I was actually thinking about experimenting with a limit3 HAL
> > > > component between the PID and the PWM.
> > >
> > > But that s/b bypassable for rigid tapping as it will increase the
> > > following error. Put it in front of the PID. I use it there to
> > > profile the spindle turnaround rates to something the Z can follow
> > > w/o throwing a Z following error.
> >
> > Yes in fron of PID, ideally in trajectory planner. I expect a limit3
> > could describe rather well what an electric motor ideally is able to
> > follow though a limit4 with variable limits would be perfect, then is
> > of course then imperfections is and how good control loop is so I
> > would guess limit3 is rather good.
> >
> And where is this limit4? No man page yet in an early this morning build 
> of master.

No it does not exist and maybe never need to because of other imperfections.


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to