I've now ensured that all tickets from T5826 are linked into the document so any holes in the proposal are missed tickets I reckon.
Any thoughts just shout :) Andy On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 at 11:11 Andrew Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > Following a smart suggestion I have moved /dev/contribute to /contrib - > there will be plenty more in there in the future and it's not really the > same as developer guides etc. Rather than just a link to phab which it is > at the moment we should put all the "getting started contributing" docs in > the wiki so that phab is _what_ we are working on no longer including _how_. > > Additionally I suggest moving from /dev to /develop - less ambiguous :) > > Andy > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 at 18:53 Andrew Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am looking at how we should be trying to structure our documentation as >> we update for interfaces and slowly move aside the legacy pages. >> >> I've made this page to summarise my thinking so far - capturing what we >> should migrate, what we should add and a few items that don't seem to fit >> yet in the new structure. I have linked tickets from the main doc >> improvement task as well to see how much we've got covered. >> >> https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/doc_system/doc_structure/ >> >> Please let me know what you think - I hope this is heading in the right >> direction. Of note is that it splits the dev docs out from the user docs >> which will also make it easier to transition :) >> >> Cheers, >> Andy >> -- >> http://andywilliams.me >> http://ajwillia.ms >> > -- > http://andywilliams.me > http://ajwillia.ms > -- http://andywilliams.me http://ajwillia.ms ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
