On 30/04/2019 17:40, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:20:19 -0700 Ross Vandegrift <r...@kallisti.us> said:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:30:33AM +0000, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
I think everyone is missing the point. What you are saying is true but
that is why then they say if you want newer stuff to use a PPA for it
even though its not in the main repo's
Yes, anyone can make a PPA. But you're talking to the maintainers of
distro packaging - we try to put packages into distros for real :)
and i think this was covered - a stable distro release that will not upgrade
meson out of principle (that's the definition of stable) isn't going to upgrade
efl either for the same reasons... so i think the topic is kind of moot. if
someone wants to make pkgs for such distros they can create upgraded meson
packages too etc. if they want to go the "all done by pkgs" path :)
This is kind of right, in an openSUSE context for a new service pack we
probably won't update Meson because it effects alot but we can update
efl / e because it doesn't affect as much, we could also add it if it
didn't exist. Further if a new version of efl fixed a serious bug that
was hard to backport we would also take the version update.
In ubuntu's case from memory the service packs tend to only be a new
installer containing all the updates so its probably less likely, but I
don't remember how ubuntu works 100% so I could be wrong.
--
Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net
Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek
SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
