On Dec 2, 2007 8:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - how expensive is evas/ecore_evas_buffer in comparison to imlib2 > > > to generate thumbs; > > > > You don't need ecore_evas_buffer to generate 'thumbs' of > > jpg/png/svg, that's only for generating smaller views of a 'general' > > evas canvas rendering. For example, if you want to show a live thumb > > of an animated edje, or bunch of edjes, or just about anything. > > Unless... Oh, oh.. unless we didn't finish off implementing > the load-size option for all loaders. I know we did it for the svg > loader, and that the jpg loader respects loading scaled-down-by-dyads, > but I can't recall if we really did finish off making sure that all > loaders respected the load-size option.. need to take a look. If not, > then it should be filed as an evas BUG.
seems that JPEG loader does respect load_size, PNG doesn't, not sure about others. I know that EPEG is there and Evas doesn't use it... e_thumb doesn't use it, but use Evas... I'm newbie to this project, so maybe you can help me understand this: is epeg just a test and the functionality was integrated to Evas's JPEG loader? This would be amazing. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri -------------------------------------- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#: 17249123 Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
