On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote : > > On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote: > > > >> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread > >> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of > >> the process. > > > > it's not our job to package our libs and binaries... It's the job of > > the package managers of the different distros. They have their own > > repositories. > > > > Vincent > Bit of a different situation when it's software in a versioning > control tree that is constantly changing and hasn't been released in > 10 years.
Please, let's not turn this into yet another release-related troll. Several distributions have official packages for e17. Even though they don't provide all the applications that are in SVN, I think that's a pretty good step forward. Cheers, -- Albin Tonnerre
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
