i don't maintain debian stuff directly in libs/apps' dirs anymore. They are
in separated directory "packaging" and they are updated and merged with
generated snapshots. Anyway, i know svn account created just for ssh is bad.
I'll find a better solution and discuss it with raster.

2010/1/25 Albin Tonnerre <lu...@debian.org>

> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:22 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
> >
> > On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre
> > <albin.tonne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
> > >>
> > >>On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr>
> > >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in
> > >>>>widespread
> > >>>>use of our software, then packages/packagers are an
> > >>>>essential part of
> > >>>>the process.
> > >>>
> > >>>it's not our job to package our libs and binaries... It's the job of
> > >>>the package managers of the different distros. They have their own
> > >>>repositories.
> > >>>
> > >>>Vincent
> > >>Bit of a different situation when it's software in a versioning
> > >>control tree that is constantly changing and hasn't been released in
> > >>10 years.
> > >
> > >Please, let's not turn this into yet another release-related
> > >troll. Several
> > >distributions have official packages for e17. Even though they
> > >don't provide all
> > >the applications that are in SVN, I think that's a pretty good
> > >step forward.
> >  Ummm? Chill out. No one is asking when or questioning whether the
> > software should be released. Slow down and read what I said in
> > context. Due to the fact of the release circumstances, it makes
> > packaging a different situation. Completely relevant.
>
> I've been maintaining all the EFL-related package in Debian for the past 2
> years. Believe me, I completely understand what it's like dealing with this
> situation. While I acknowledge that this used to be a PITA (things improved
> quite a bit recently), I'm pretty convinced that maintaing my packages in
> the
> SVN would have made my work even harder.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Albin Tonnerre
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLXg6AAAoJEBEG8gBbtuSlBScQALUbBz2jVbENFjInJLiIVPRy
> OpObQHWX3AQxMUA2ARJpxaWdQr7P+/f767XUgBbIKhePXtsVh/0UFTizG5qZ2+Ir
> uh+XvE5nkcTg+0KqMGmEQR8CFTUIKPJhWUHK0UWmRNyZOUDvCcGGfV0afi8DkhCS
> AM7WjFFQSiLjPzTPArSGpizKGFnmbZjLLNYpuhQGHdks+DOAdAshsdrAQw2Sn7rO
> VwQWyerDiqrGVaB4Coe7iObXx+IgUUlJoDVF2IQVr5VGDvbwU0SFxANvb3FeSGyQ
> pl9SsmbX+B8IluN6GOukr+Rfq/F+WqlDUgJacCzOGuMBM/rxaS4JO/elYdr8r4Az
> Nw/31q97QA/AiAW3PwhRwu7YeOLgk24yFrz0fZ5b/ri7bEMkwDNutTFl6HV7DbDF
> GvLbxq1F9sWcn4rQ/B9mnxTK9jEdf3lkN3KeXh1C2BPaxNBp/rayuhW96vCfLenG
> MPbPoHXjOf0mUWyREP8Tiyl20admsC2jHIo8g3V2+79dqzlb/MDIvjFkrzHbIUVu
> iHsjT0OF5TCZXI7n6W2BjuwZADzEvnBDFQ3vHjY+J1lYcBbvgDlot7jsFEZWecbG
> jXPckfvRcfMYN2lZj6eEvZQ+FeqACSSDJ0kAwjGWq9D6enN1p4gOfaUM+yNADSgT
> QLNpOAK3ibqom+BMU0j6
> =XmQ8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to