On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote : >> >> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote: >>> >>>> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in >>>> widespread >>>> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential >>>> part of >>>> the process. >>> >>> it's not our job to package our libs and binaries... It's the job of >>> the package managers of the different distros. They have their own >>> repositories. >>> >>> Vincent >> Bit of a different situation when it's software in a versioning >> control tree that is constantly changing and hasn't been released in >> 10 years. > > Please, let's not turn this into yet another release-related troll. > Several > distributions have official packages for e17. Even though they don't > provide all > the applications that are in SVN, I think that's a pretty good step > forward. Ummm? Chill out. No one is asking when or questioning whether the software should be released. Slow down and read what I said in context. Due to the fact of the release circumstances, it makes packaging a different situation. Completely relevant. > Cheers, > -- > Albin Tonnerre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
