On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi >> <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler >>> <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi >>>> <lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> said: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM, <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 16/04/13 16:01, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Hacohen >>>>>>>> <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 16/04/13 15:26, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hacohen >>>>>>>>>> <tom.haco...@samsung.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How are you? I just noticed that 'edbus' installs headers >>>>>>>>>>> under: prefix/include/edbus-1 >>>>>>>>>>> while using the >>>>>>>>>>> pkgconfig name 'edbus2' >>>>>>>>>>> the library name 'libedbus2' >>>>>>>>>>> and an header called 'EDbus.h'. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Luckily for us, it's not too late to fix it. Only question, >>>>>>>>>>> what should >>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>> change it to? Everywhere with the 2 or everywhere without >>>>>>>>>>> the 2? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> E_DBus installed edbus.pc and libedbus.so - that's why we >>>>>>>>>> needed to put a 2 in the name. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> However the name is edbus and has no relations with the >>>>>>>>>> previous library. It's not a new version, it's a complete >>>>>>>>>> different one. So appending a "2" in headers and include >>>>>>>>>> path is the wrong thing to do. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If ebus was available I would vote for that. It seems we are >>>>>>>>>> short in options for names. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lucas De Marchi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I understand putting the 2 was needed, but if we add it once, >>>>>>>>> we should add >>>>>>>>> it everywhere. It's annoyingly inconsistent. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why did you choose 2 then? Why not 4? Or A? You chose 2 >>>>>>>>> because it's the >>>>>>>>> best explanation, as it is, although mostly unrelated, e_dbus >>>>>>>>> v2. And if >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> because it was not me is the best explanation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> that's good enough there, it's good enough everywhere. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In conclusion, I see no harm in using edbus2 all around the >>>>>>>>> place. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it's not good enough there, even less everywhere. The visible >>>>>>>> part to the developer is the include path and the namespace. >>>>>>>> And these should reflect the library name. If anything change >>>>>>>> everything to something else, but don't put the 2 there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's wait to see what others think, as we disagree about the >>>>>>> source of the problem, and that's: is this a major >>>>>>> inconsistency that should be solved. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyhow, regarding different names: I suggest edbus2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Tom. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of >>>>>>> advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform >>>>>>> includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for >>>>>>> data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data >>>>>>> analysis & visualization. Get a free account! >>>>>>> http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> enlightenment-devel mailing list >>>>>>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree with whatever demarchi says. >>>>> >>>>> I disagree. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> oh, wait... >>>>> >>>>> Lucas De Marchi >>>> >>>> :-P ... i have to say though - consistency is good. not just for >>>> devs, but packagers and anyone looking at their filesystem. if >>>> things are named in a consistent pattern it is easy to know what >>>> belongs where without needing package databases or other forensics >>>> tools. >>> >>> Sure it's good, no doubt. Just that renaming to edbus2 for the sake of >>> consistency is even worse, not because of the rename, but because of >>> the name chosen. >>> >>> ebus? anyone? >> >> The name of the ebus goes 'round and 'round. > > As we all like E, I suggest edeebus
+1 from me. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
