On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Tom Hacohen <t...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > On 24/08/16 16:52, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
[snip] >> I don't like that efl_self is a macro. It is completely unnecessary for it >> to be a macro. > > You are wrong. I'd expand on it, but the code is there, just read it. I've read it over and over in the last two years. Why do you need to name the variable __efl_self instead of efl_self? Then efl_self works without it being a macro. >> On the naming issue: I think there's too much magic on eo_add, I >> liked the older passing a pointer to the actual object better. But >> I was the only one. > > I already replied to Gustavo about why this magic is useful. I know why most people like the syntax sugar. IMO it is not a good tradeoff. > -- > Tom. Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
