On Sunday, August 4, 2013 2:58:59 AM UTC+3, sadovnik socratus wrote: > > Reference frames and Existence. > > ===… > > There are many pretty solid theories. > > How can be known which theory is wrong and which theory is true ? > > The answer depends on which reference frame the theory is based. > > The conception of reference frame is the key to know if the theory is > true one. > > # > > We know many different reference frames > > ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D, . . . MD . . . . ) > > > > Existence cannot begin from a complex system. > > In the beginning must be a simple model. > > Therefore, I will take a two dimensions space as the simplest model. > > But there are two kinds of two dimensions: the Euclidean ( 2D) space > > and Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space. > > What is possible to say about these systems ? > > Which reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ? > > # > > Euclidean ( 2D) reference frame belongs to a gravity space > > where space and time are two different substances. > > Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity > > and space and time are one and the same unite continuum. > > # > > Later Descartes changed Euclidean two dimensions into three > > dimensions . Living in this Descartes system of coordinate > > we try to understand : where did our existence come from ? > > Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski negative > > Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without gravity ) as the simplest model > > to have the searching answer. > > ============…. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
