If you begin with sense, then energy and time are different halves of the same thing ( that we called Life ), because you use your personal , local energy in an infinity Earth's time. ===
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com>wrote: > If you don't have sense, you can't discern identity. If you don't have a > sense to compare and infer among sensations, there can be no action or > sequence. If you begin with sense, then energy and time are two halves of > the same thing, which is that sense of comparison of experiences, and space > is the sense of contrast between parallel histories of experience. > > Craig > > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:50:07 AM UTC-4, Lonnie Clay wrote: >> >> At the minimum, you need an identity, an action, and a sequence to exist. >> That requires space, energy, and time. Whether energy should be considered >> a dimension is dependent upon whether there exists a minimum quanta of >> energy required for the least action operation. See : >> https://sites.google.com/site/**lonniecourtneyclay/home/** >> blarney-part1-mythology<https://sites.google.com/site/lonniecourtneyclay/home/blarney-part1-mythology> >> >> Lonnie Courtney Clay >> >> >> On Saturday, August 3, 2013 4:58:59 PM UTC-7, sadovnik socratus wrote: >>> >>> Reference frames and Existence. >>> >>> ===… >>> >>> There are many pretty solid theories. >>> >>> How can be known which theory is wrong and which theory is true ? >>> >>> The answer depends on which reference frame the theory is based. >>> >>> The conception of reference frame is the key to know if the theory is >>> true one. >>> >>> # >>> >>> We know many different reference frames >>> >>> ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D, . . . MD . . . . ) >>> >>> >>> >>> Existence cannot begin from a complex system. >>> >>> In the beginning must be a simple model. >>> >>> Therefore, I will take a two dimensions space as the simplest model. >>> >>> But there are two kinds of two dimensions: the Euclidean ( 2D) space >>> >>> and Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space. >>> >>> What is possible to say about these systems ? >>> >>> Which reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ? >>> >>> # >>> >>> Euclidean ( 2D) reference frame belongs to a gravity space >>> >>> where space and time are two different substances. >>> >>> Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity >>> >>> and space and time are one and the same unite continuum. >>> >>> # >>> >>> Later Descartes changed Euclidean two dimensions into three >>> >>> dimensions . Living in this Descartes system of coordinate >>> >>> we try to understand : where did our existence come from ? >>> >>> Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski negative >>> >>> Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without gravity ) as the simplest model >>> >>> to have the searching answer. >>> >>> ============…. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother. / Albert Einstein / The secret of God and Existence is hidden in ‘Quantum of Light Theory ’. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
