awori.achoka:
. . . could light be the original source of life forming molecules....? ====. I like your question. The cloud of rubidium atoms just a few degrees above absolute zero can be only in superconductivity state . . . . . then fired single photons into the cloud of atoms .. . . . . . they are binding together to form molecules. . . . What kind of molecules can they be? In my opinion: only helium II . . . . ? ! ? ! Light Quanta can be the original source of life forming molecules.in my opinion =.. On Friday, September 27, 2013 2:05:50 PM UTC+2, Awori wrote: > In view of the above findings and our earlier discussions...could light be > the original source of life forming molecules....? > On Sep 27, 2013 2:54 PM, "awori achoka" <awori....@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> What do you make of this? >> >> http://m.phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-never-before-seen.html >> On Aug 4, 2013 2:59 AM, "sadovnik socratus" >> <is.so...@gmail.com<javascript:>> >> wrote: >> >>> Reference frames and Existence.****** >>> >>> ===…**** >>> >>> There are many pretty solid theories.**** >>> >>> How can be known which theory is wrong and which theory is true ? * >>> *** >>> >>> The answer depends on which reference frame the theory is based. **** >>> >>> The conception of reference frame is the key to know if the theory is >>> true one.**** >>> >>> # **** >>> >>> We know many different reference frames**** >>> >>> ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D, . . . MD . . . . )**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Existence cannot begin from a complex system.**** >>> >>> In the beginning must be a simple model. **** >>> >>> Therefore, I will take a two dimensions space as the simplest model.*** >>> * >>> >>> But there are two kinds of two dimensions: the Euclidean ( 2D) space >>> **** >>> >>> and Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space.**** >>> >>> What is possible to say about these systems ?**** >>> >>> Which reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ?**** >>> >>> #**** >>> >>> Euclidean ( 2D) reference frame belongs to a gravity space **** >>> >>> where space and time are two different substances. **** >>> >>> Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity **** >>> >>> and space and time are one and the same unite continuum.**** >>> >>> #**** >>> >>> Later Descartes changed Euclidean two dimensions into three **** >>> >>> dimensions . Living in this Descartes system of coordinate**** >>> >>> we try to understand : where did our existence come from ?**** >>> >>> Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski negative **** >>> >>> Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without gravity ) as the simplest model**** >>> >>> to have the searching answer. **** >>> >>> ============….**** >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Epistemology" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to epistemology...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >>> To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >>> . >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
