On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 11:43:14 PM UTC-4, sadovnik socratus wrote:
>
> If you begin with sense,
>  then energy and time are different halves of the same thing
>  ( that we called  Life ), because you use your 
>  personal , local energy in an infinity Earth's time.
>

I don't think that energy exists, any more than money exists. Energy is 
what we call the initiation of change among sensitive bodies. It's just 
coordinated sensory-motor interaction, just as traffic is coordinated by 
millions of drivers control of their cars rather than an abstract geometric 
field.

Energy and time are not just parts of biological life, they are measures of 
change across all scales and stages of development. A star's sense and 
motive gives us an impression of energy and time, but we don't have to jump 
to that conclusion. The star can be, like us, an experience which borrows 
its own time and energy from everything else.

Craig

 

> ===
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Craig Weinberg 
> <whats...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> If you don't have sense, you can't discern identity. If you don't have a 
>> sense to compare and infer among sensations, there can be no action or 
>> sequence. If you begin with sense, then energy and time are two halves of 
>> the same thing, which is that sense of comparison of experiences, and space 
>> is the sense of contrast between parallel histories of experience.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:50:07 AM UTC-4, Lonnie Clay wrote:
>>>
>>> At the minimum, you need an identity, an action, and a sequence to 
>>> exist. That requires space, energy, and time. Whether energy should be 
>>> considered a dimension is dependent upon whether there exists a minimum 
>>> quanta of energy required for the least action operation. See :
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/**lonniecourtneyclay/home/**
>>> blarney-part1-mythology<https://sites.google.com/site/lonniecourtneyclay/home/blarney-part1-mythology>
>>>
>>> Lonnie Courtney Clay
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, August 3, 2013 4:58:59 PM UTC-7, sadovnik socratus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    Reference frames and  Existence.
>>>>
>>>> ===…
>>>>
>>>> There are many pretty solid theories.
>>>>
>>>> How can be known which  theory  is wrong and  which  theory is true ?  
>>>>
>>>> The answer depends on which reference frame  the theory is based. 
>>>>
>>>> The conception of reference frame  is the key to know if the theory is 
>>>> true one.
>>>>
>>>> # 
>>>>
>>>>  We know  many different   reference  frames
>>>>
>>>> ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D,  . . .  MD . . . .  )
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>  Existence cannot begin from a complex system.
>>>>
>>>> In the beginning  must be a simple model. 
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, I will take a  two dimensions space as the simplest model.
>>>>
>>>> But there are  two kinds of two dimensions:  the Euclidean ( 2D)  space 
>>>>
>>>> and  Minkowski  negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space.
>>>>
>>>> What is possible to say about these systems ?
>>>>
>>>> Which  reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ?
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> Euclidean ( 2D)  reference frame belongs to  a gravity space 
>>>>
>>>> where space and time are two different substances.  
>>>>
>>>> Minkowski  negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity 
>>>>
>>>> and space and time are one and the same unite continuum.
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> Later Descartes changed  Euclidean  two dimensions  into three 
>>>>
>>>>  dimensions  .  Living in this   Descartes  system of coordinate
>>>>
>>>>  we try to understand : where did our existence come from ?
>>>>
>>>> Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski  negative 
>>>>
>>>> Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without  gravity ) as the simplest model
>>>>
>>>>  to have the searching answer. 
>>>>
>>>> ============….
>>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Epistemology" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to epistemology...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> You do not really understand something unless you can explain
>  it to your grandmother.    / Albert Einstein /
> The secret of God and Existence is hidden in ‘Quantum of Light Theory ’. 
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to