In view of the above findings and our earlier discussions...could light be
the original source of life forming molecules....?
On Sep 27, 2013 2:54 PM, "awori achoka" <awori.ach...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What do you make of this?
>
> http://m.phys.org/news/2013-09-scientists-never-before-seen.html
> On Aug 4, 2013 2:59 AM, "sadovnik socratus" <is.socra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>    Reference frames and  Existence.******
>>
>> ===…****
>>
>> There are many pretty solid theories.****
>>
>> How can be known which  theory  is wrong and  which  theory is true ?  **
>> **
>>
>> The answer depends on which reference frame  the theory is based. ****
>>
>> The conception of reference frame  is the key to know if the theory is
>> true one.****
>>
>> # ****
>>
>>  We know  many different   reference  frames****
>>
>> ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D,  . . .  MD . . . .  )****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>>  Existence cannot begin from a complex system.****
>>
>> In the beginning  must be a simple model. ****
>>
>> Therefore, I will take a  two dimensions space as the simplest model.****
>>
>> But there are  two kinds of two dimensions:  the Euclidean ( 2D)  space *
>> ***
>>
>> and  Minkowski  negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space.****
>>
>> What is possible to say about these systems ?****
>>
>> Which  reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ?****
>>
>> #****
>>
>> Euclidean ( 2D)  reference frame belongs to  a gravity space ****
>>
>> where space and time are two different substances.  ****
>>
>> Minkowski  negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity ****
>>
>> and space and time are one and the same unite continuum.****
>>
>> #****
>>
>> Later Descartes changed  Euclidean  two dimensions  into three ****
>>
>>  dimensions  .  Living in this   Descartes  system of coordinate****
>>
>>  we try to understand : where did our existence come from ?****
>>
>> Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski  negative ****
>>
>> Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without  gravity ) as the simplest model****
>>
>>  to have the searching answer. ****
>>
>> ============….****
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Epistemology" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to