On 7/5/2025 11:42 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
Batty/Rutger Hauer)
Le dim. 6 juil. 2025, 06:43, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> a
écrit :
On 7/5/2025 7:16 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
With MWI, measurement is just unitary evolution entangling the
observer with the system, so no collapse postulate is added.
Copenhagen plus decoherence still requires you to say the
wavefunction really collapses to one outcome.
You say that like agreement with experience is a flaw.
One and only one history is a flaw imo and I already explained why I
have that opinion.
MWI just treats the whole process as continuous evolution, with
all branches persisting.
I know. But it still assumes the experimenter is free to choose
what measurement he makes...
Of course as he makes them all.
unlike superdeterminism. So if you really think determinism is
important...
Then I should follow a non sensical theory?
In MWI, determinism applies to the whole wavefunction, but freedom of
choice still appears inside each branch, without any global conspiracy
linking settings to hidden variables. That’s why it isn’t
superdeterminism.
Why would you suppose that determinism applies to everything, but then
make an exception for brains.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3633b3f9-6208-4cf1-99fe-efe4322294f1%40gmail.com.
