Roger, Any kind of particle from photons and light up to molecules can
form a BEC. BEC is a mathematical object and not confined to any one
substance. Even physical BECs have properties that are effectively
outside spacetime.
Richard

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Hi Richard Ruquist
>
> That sounds fine, except the BEC is not something specific, it is
> not a mind or brain, it is matter. I imagine that it condenses in
> some container held near 0oC. That condensate could be
> considered to be a monad or substance. And it could of course
> be conscious in some way, but it has nothing to do with being human.
> It is not even a brain in a vat.
>
>
>
> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
> 1/16/2013
> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
> ----- Receiving the following content -----
> From: Richard Ruquist
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2013-01-16, 07:47:52
> Subject: Fwd: the curse of materialism
>
>
> Roger,
> I liked your "1p think therefore 1p am"
>
> But your statement below, although correct , is much too vague.
>
> Quantum mechanics is not understood because it is not complete.
> Feynman came close to completing it but still missed an essential property.
>
> That property is that the quantum mind has instant action.
> Something you have been preaching for some time.
> With instant action, the quantum mind can be understood.
>
> Instant action derives directly from your claim that
> the quantum mind from monads to quantum fields
> are out side of spacetime.
>
> I just add that it is effectively out of spacetime
> because the quantum mind is a
>  Bose-Einstein Condensate BEC.
> which allows the monads to be distributed thru-out the universe yet
> act as though they were out of spacetime.
> Richard
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Roger Clough
> Date: Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:01 AM
> Subject: the curse of materialism
> To: everything-list
>
>
> Hi socra...@bezeqint.net
>
> You want to know why nobody understands QM ?
> Because QM is nonphysical, but is treated as being physical.
> This might be called the curse of materialism.
>
>
> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
> 1/16/2013
> "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." - Woody Allen
> ----- Receiving the following content -----
> From: socra...@bezeqint.net
> Receiver: Everything List
> Time: 2013-01-15, 11:20:20
> Subject: Re: Science is a religion by itself.
>
>
> Physics and Metaphysics.
>
> John Polkinghorne and his book ? Quantum theory?.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Polkinghorne
> === .
>
> John Polkinghorne took epigraph for his book ? Quantum theory?
> the Feynman? thought : ? I think I can safely say that
> nobody understands quantum mechanics. ?
> Why?
> Because, he wrote:
> ? ,we do not understand the theory as fully as we should.
> We shall see in what follows that important interpretative
> issues remain unresolved. They will demand for their
> eventual settlement not only physical insight but also
> metaphysical decision ?.
> / preface/
> ? Serious interpretative problems remain unresolved,
> and these are the subject of continuing dispute?
> / page 40/
> ? If the study of quantum physics teaches one anything,
> it is that the world is full of surprises?
> / page 87 /
> ? Metaphysical criteria that the scientific community take
> very seriously in assessing the weight to put on a theory
> include: . . . .?
> / page 88 /
> ?uantum theory is certainly strange and surprising, . . .?
> / page92 /
> ? Wave / particle duality is a highly surprising and
> instructive phenomenon, . .?
> / page 92 /
> ==.
> In my opinion John Polkinghorne was right writing
> what to understand and to solve the problems of the Universe:
> ? They will demand for their eventual settlement not only
> physical insight but also metaphysical decision ?.
> / preface /
> And, maybe, Aristotle was right separating the world and knowledge
> on two parts: Physics and Metaphysics.
> === .
> Somebody wrote:
> The science will purify the religion of the ?ross?.
> I agree.
> ===========.
> Best wishes.
> Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
> ===.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to