Name me one large city that gets its power 100% exclusively from coal or from nuclear? You can't because all major energy markets are fed by a mix of energy generation capacity. Yet you keep on with this straw man argument. Why?
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of spudboy...@aol.com Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 10:14 AM To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Our Demon-Haunted World I would say you are incorrect concerning cities which rely on one primary power source, especially, if its local or regional. Power by wire, is common practice, but first we must have sufficient spinning, or ready reserve. My objection is now the source of power, but if it produce enough power at an affordable cost? Your solar and wind may, 17 years from now, do the job that gas turbines, or nukes, or coal, or hydroelectric does right now. Right now, today 40 GW (is that Gigawatt hours or days?) is no more then a trifling amount of what is needed by the human species. I object to governments switching off power, when no sufficient substitute now exists. Many greens are fine with rolling blackouts and brownouts because at least whatever power is produced is environmentally benign. I suspect that when people start doing a die-off, the Greens will state: "Oh, then would've died anyway from pollution, contamination, and a ruined environment.." -----Original Message----- From: meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Sat, Nov 9, 2013 11:44 pm Subject: Re: Our Demon-Haunted World On 11/9/2013 4:53 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote: Your basically saying I am wrong for no contestable reason, you have no city in the world to cite to me that is powered by solar power or wind, for that matter, And there are none powered exclusively by hydroelectric power either. It's a completely specious critereon that you cite as though it meant something. Because B cannot now completely satisfy all demand for X currently supplied by A doesn't make B useless, nor does it make A desirable or necessary. Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
